Wong v. Clean 88 Inc et al
New York Eastern District Court | |
Judge: | Brian M Cogan |
Case #: | 1:24-cv-04942 |
Nature of Suit | 710 Labor - Fair Labor Standards Act |
Cause | 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Case Filed: | Jul 16, 2024 |
Terminated: | Jul 29, 2024 |
Last checked: Saturday Aug 31, 2024 5:54 AM EDT |
Defendant
Clean 88 Inc
|
|
Defendant
Rong Hua Li
|
|
Defendant
Store 88 Inc
|
|
Defendant
Duan Yang
|
|
Plaintiff
Mang Kam Wong
|
Represented By
|
Docket last updated: 09/30/2024 11:59 PM EDT |
Monday, July 29, 2024 | ||
6 | 6
notice
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
Mon 07/29 3:12 PM
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Mang Kam Wong (Wong, Vincent) |
|
order
~Util - Terminate Civil Case
Mon 07/29 3:49 PM
Civil Case Terminated as per plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. (PW) |
||
Wednesday, July 17, 2024 | ||
5 | 5
order
Scheduling Order
Wed 07/17 12:00 PM
SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic Initial Status Conference is set for 8/28/2024 at 10:00 am. The parties are directed to call 571-353-2301 and enter Meeting ID 949146687#. See attached mandatory requirements for the conference. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 7/17/2024. (PW) |
|
4 | 4
service
Summons Issued
Wed 07/17 9:07 AM
Summons Issued as to Clean 88 Inc, Rong Hua Li, Store 88 Inc, Duan Yang. (KD) |
|
Tuesday, July 16, 2024 | ||
3 | 3
misc
Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet
Tue 07/16 5:52 PM
Proposed Summons. Re1 Complaint by Mang Kam Wong (Wong, Vincent) |
|
2 | 2
misc
Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet
Tue 07/16 5:51 PM
Civil Cover Sheet.. Re1 Complaint by Mang Kam Wong (Wong, Vincent) |
|
1 | 1
13
pgs
cmp
Complaint
Tue 07/16 5:50 PM
COMPLAINT against Clean 88 Inc, Rong Hua Li, Store 88 Inc, Duan Yang filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-18076056 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Mang Kam Wong. (Wong, Vincent) |
|
utility
Case Assigned/Reassigned
Wed 07/17 9:01 AM
Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our[LINK:website] . Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |