Crystallex International Corp v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezue
Original Case: 1:17-mc-00151
| Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals | |
| Case #: | 0:18-cv-02797 |
| Type | civil / private / federal question |
| Nature of Suit | 890 Other Statutes - Other Statutory Actions |
| Case Filed: | Aug 15, 2018 |
| Terminated: | Jul 29, 2019 |
| Last checked: Sunday Jul 09, 2023 11:01 AM EDT |
|
Amicus Appellant
BLACKROCK FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INC
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Appellant
CONTRARIAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant
BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA
|
|
|
Defendant - Appellee
BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA
|
|
|
Defendant - Intervenor-appellant
BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant - Proposed Intervenor
BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA
|
Represented By
|
|
Intervenor - Appellant
PETROLEOS DE VENEZUELA SA
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellee
CRYSTALLEX INTERNATIONAL CORP
|
Represented By
|
|
Proposed Amicus-Appellant
BLACKROCK FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INC
|
Represented By
|
|
Proposed Amicus-Appellant
CONTRARIAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
|
Represented By
|
GPO
Nov 23 2018
ORDER filed (Coram: MCKEE, VANASKIE and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges) The petition for rehearing filed by Petitioner Petroleos de Venezuela SA in No. 18-2889 by the panel is granted. The order denying the petition for writ of mandamus and leave for petitioner to file a reply entered October 26, 2018 is hereby vacated; and, it is further ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby consolidated with the appeals at Nos. 18-2797 and 18-3124 for disposition. Petitioner's reply to the response and supplemental response filed by Respondent Crystallex International Corporation which was submitted on October 16, 2018 is deemed filed as of the date of this order. The petition for writ of mandamus, the response, supplemental response, and the reply are referred to the same merits panel which will consider the appeals at Nos. 18-2797 and 18-3124; and, it is further ORDERED that all proceedings in the District Court are hereby stayed pending the merits panel's disposition of the petition for writ of mandamus and the consolidated appeals; and, in light of this action taken by the panel, the petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot at the Court's direction. The action taken by the panel today should not be construed as a determination that mandamus relief is appropriate. The merits panel will determine whether mandamus relief is warranted. Authoring Judge: Vanaskie. |
|
|
GPO
Jul 29 2019
PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: AMBRO, GREENAWAY JR. and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 45. Judge: AMBRO Authoring. [18-2797, 18-2889, 18-3124] |
| 1. | Venezuela's Citgo Stake Can Be Seized, Appeals Court Says (wsj.com) |
| Submitted Tue 07/30/2019 | |
| Docket last updated: 07/09/2023 11:01 AM EDT |
| Wednesday, August 15, 2018 | ||
| RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (LMR) | ||
| CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Petroleos de Venezuela SA in District Court No. 1-17-mc-00151. (LMR) | ||
|
Att: 1
2 pgs
Case Opening Letter
|
||
|
Att: 2
1 pgs
STANDING ORDER
|
||
|
Att: 3
1 pgs
Case Caption
|
||
|
Att: 4
2 pgs
Notice of Appeal
|
||
|
Att: 5
2 pgs
ORDER
|
||
|
Att: 6
76 pgs
OPINION
|
||
|
ORDER (Clerk) continuing the seal for 30 days from the date of this order. A motion to continue the seal, pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 106(2)(c), must be filed within the 30-day period, or the seal will be lifted. Any motion under 3d Cir. L.A.R. 106(c)(2) should specify the scope of the relief requested, the basis for sealing or proceeding under a pseudonym, and the desired duration of the sealing order. Motion due 09/14/2018. (LMR)
|
||