Korth v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
Consolidated
Lead case: 1:20-md-02974
Lead case: 1:20-md-02974
| Georgia Northern District Court | |
| Judge: | Leigh Martin May |
| Case #: | 1:22-cv-02615 |
| Nature of Suit | 367 Torts - Personal Injury - Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury/Product Liability |
| Cause | 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Case Filed: | Jun 30, 2022 |
| Terminated: | Jun 30, 2022 |
| Last checked: Tuesday Dec 27, 2022 3:53 AM EST |
|
Defendant
CooperSurgical, Inc.
|
|
|
Defendant
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
|
|
|
Defendant
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
|
|
|
Defendant
Teva Womens Health, LLC
|
|
|
Defendant
The Cooper Companies, Inc.
|
|
|
Plaintiff
Andee Korth
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 6 hours ago |
| Friday, November 15, 2024 | ||
| 12 | 12
2
pgs
order
Order
Mon 11/18 7:48 PM
ORDER: Defendants' Consent Motion to Revise Leadership Structure for MDL Proceedings, Doc. No. 731, is GRANTED. Therefore, the Clerk is directed to substitute Kasey M. Adams, Esq., for Tara L. Blake, Esq., as Co-Lead Counsel for the Cooper Defendants in this action and in all associated cases. (Second Copy of 732 in 1:20-md-02974-LMM. Entered in member cases 1:22-cv-1028 through 3:20- cv-194.) Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 11/15/2024. (tht) |
|
| 11 | 11
1
pgs
order
Order
Mon 11/18 1:35 PM
ORDER granting (730 in 1:20-md-02974-LMM) Tara L. Blake's unopposed motion to withdraw as counsel of record for Defendants CooperSurgical, Inc. and The Cooper Companies, Inc. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 11/15/2024. (Second Copy of 732 in 1:20-md-02974-LMM. Entered in member cases 1:22-cv-1028 through 3:20-cv-194.) (bgt) |
|
| Wednesday, November 08, 2023 | ||
| 10 | 10
misc
Judgment - Clerk
Wed 11/08 4:41 PM
CLERK'S JUDGMENT (tht) |
|
| Monday, November 06, 2023 | ||
| 9 | 9
2
pgs
order
Order to Dismiss
Mon 11/06 4:04 PM
ORDER: Pursuant to the Court's October 5, 2023, Show Cause Order regarding Plaintiff Fact Sheets, certain Plaintiffs were granted a 21-days extension from the date of the Order or until October 26, 2023 to serve a Plaintiff Fact Sheet (PFS). The following Plaintiffs have still not submitted a PFS. Accordingly, the cases listed within this order are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 11/06/2023. Associated Cases: 1:20-md-02974-LMM et al. (tht) |
|
| Thursday, October 05, 2023 | ||
| 8 | 8
2
pgs
order
Order
Fri 10/06 9:20 AM
ORDER: All Plaintiffs in this MDL are required to provide Plaintiff Fact Sheets (PFS) to Defendants as part of their discovery obligations. After the deadline for filing these fact sheets expired, the Court entered a show cause order on June 15, 2023, asking certain Plaintiffs to show cause why their cases should not be dismissed for failure to comply with this Courts order relating to these PFS. Dkt. No. 517 . The Court also heard argument from counsel on August 23, 2023, as to how the various responses to this show cause order should be treated. The Court ruled based on the categories of the various responses and asked counsel to prepare a list of the cases that fall within these categories. The parties have now provided a consent list of the cases that fall within the Court's categories. This list is attached as Exhibit A to this order and is divided by category of response. Referencing Exhibit A, the Court rules as follows: 1. Category 1 consists of Plaintiffs who failed to respond to the Courts show cause order. Category 2 contains Plaintiffs who agree dismissals are warranted. Category 3 contains Plaintiffs with deficiencies in their PFS that will not be cured. Category 4 contains Plaintiffs where counsel has lost contact with Plaintiff, and counsel agrees they failed to comply with the Court's order. The cases for Plaintiffs in these categories are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. Category 5 consists of Plaintiffs who seek an extension of time to file a PFS. The Court ORDERS that these Plaintiffs have 21 days from the date of this order to file a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. If they fail to comply, their cases will be dismissed with prejudice. 3. Category 6 consists of Plaintiffs who filed a PFS after entry of the Courts show cause order. The Court accepts these late-filed PFS and finds that the show cause order as to these Plaintiffs has been satisfied. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 10/05/2023. Associated Cases: 1:20-md-02974-LMM et al.(tht) |
|
|
Att: 1
Exhibit
|
||
| Friday, June 30, 2023 | ||
|
utility
Submission to District Judge
Fri 06/30 9:35 AM
Submission of 517 Order to Show Cause, to District Judge Leigh Martin May. Associated Cases: 1:20-md-02974-LMM et al.(bnp) |
||
| Thursday, June 29, 2023 | ||
| 7 | 7
respoth
Response to Order to Show Cause
Thu 06/29 5:32 PM
RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE filed by Andee Korth. (Hammers, Robert) |
|
| Thursday, June 15, 2023 | ||
| 6 | 6
3
pgs
order
Order to Show Cause
Thu 06/15 5:05 PM
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiffs identified on Exhibit 1 are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE within 14 days from the entry of this Order, in a written submission as to why their cases should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to comply with PFS CMOs. Defendants may file a response within 5 business days after service of Plaintiffs' submission, but Defendants are not required to submit a response unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Failure to show cause by failing to file such a submission within 14 days from the entry of this Order may result in dismissal of Plaintiff's case. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 6/15/2023.Associated Cases: 1:20-md-02974-LMM et al.(bnp) |
|
|
Att: 1
Exhibit 1 Delinquent PFS
|
||
| Friday, January 27, 2023 | ||
| 5 | 5
1
pgs
order
Order Allowing Audio/Visual Equipment in the Courtroom
Fri 01/27 9:23 AM
ORDER ALLOWING AUDIO/VISUAL EQUIPMENT IN THE COURTROOM on January 20, 2023 and January 31, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 1/27/2023. Associated Cases: 1:20-md-02974-LMM et al.(jra) |
|
| Tuesday, January 17, 2023 | ||
| 4 | 4
1
pgs
order
Order
Tue 01/17 12:23 PM
ORDER: In response to the Court's direction and after they attempted to agree ona mediator, the parties provided the Court with names of suggested mediators. The Court met with the parties to discuss their submissions. Following that meeting, the Court interviewed each of the proposed mediators. Following those interviews, the Court has selected M. Gino Brogdon, Sr. to serve as mediator of this MDL. The Court has informed him of the Court's next inperson conference. He will be joining the parties for lunch via zoom on January 30 and for dinner that evening. The Court will provide further details to the parties regarding Judge Brogdon's appointment at our next conference. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 1/17/2023. Associated Cases: 1:20-md-02974-LMM et al.(jra) |
|
| Wednesday, August 31, 2022 | ||
|
utility
Remark
Wed 08/31 3:24 PM
Remark: Counsel should review all Orders docketed in MDL Case No. 1:20-md-2974-LMM. The Court's Case Management Orders and other case-related documents can also be found on the Court's MDL web page: https://www.gand.uscourts.gov/20md2974 (Docket entry spread to all cases.) Associated Cases: 1:20-md-02974-LMM et al.(bnp) |
||
| Sunday, July 10, 2022 | ||
| 3 | 3
service
Waiver of Service Executed
Sun 07/10 7:37 PM
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Andee Korth. All Defendants.(Hammers, Robert) |
|
|
Att: 1
Exhibit Waiver of Service of Summons,
|
||
|
Att: 2
Exhibit Waiver of Service of Summons,
|
||
|
Att: 3
Exhibit Waiver of Service of Summons,
|
||
|
Att: 4
Exhibit Waiver of Service of Summons,
|
||
|
Att: 5
Exhibit Waiver of Service of Summons
|
||
| Thursday, June 30, 2022 | ||
| 2 | 2
6
pgs
order
Order
Thu 06/30 12:30 PM
ORDER INITIAL CONFERENCE: The Court held its Initial Conference in this MDL on February 9, 2021. The below are the orders entered after discussion of these issues at that conference. 1. Leadership structure: After the Court discussed issues concerning the leadership structure with all parties, the Court ORDERED Plaintiffs and Defendants to each file their proposed consent motion and order as to their requested leadership structure and team within 7 days of the date of this order. 2. Future status conferences: The Court will hold status conferences once a month. The next six conferences will take place on the following dates at 10:00 am via zoom: Tuesday, March 9, 2021; Monday, April 12, 2021; Wednesday, May 12, 2021; Monday, June 14, 2021; Tuesday, July 13, 2021; Friday, August 20, 2021. The Court will send out the zoom links prior to the conferences. The parties will submit a proposed consent agenda 3 business days prior to the conference. The parties will also confer as to the format for presenting issues that require additional explanation. When these are necessary, they should also be filed 3 business days before the conference. 3. Stay of responsive pleading obligations: The Court continues the stay of responsive pleading obligations provided for in Section 6(b) of the Courts initial order. 4. Pending motions: The Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE all pending motions in the individual cases comprising the MDL. These cases are also ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. These terminated motions will later be refiled in accordance with an upcoming Case Management Order. 5. Docketing: All parties are to docket future filings only in the MDL case. The case caption should indicate whether any filing applies to all cases or list the individual cases to which it should apply. 6. Electronic service: The Court ORDERS all attorneys participating in the MDL proceeding to register with the Courts CM/ECF system. Because all attorneys will then receive electronic copies of documents filed in the MDL, the Court ORDERS that electronic service of documents via the Courts CM/ECF system satisfies the obligation of service. Hereafter, unless otherwise ordered, neither the clerks office nor counsel for the parties shall be obligated to provide service copies of any filings or related orders by U.S. Mail or any other means to attorneys who have not registered with the Courts CM/ECF system. An attorney who is not participating in the MDL and does not want to receive CM/ECF notifications may file a motion to withdraw or a certificate of consent to withdraw in accordance with Local Rule 83.1(E). 7. Initial disclosures: The Court GRANTS the parties joint request for the Court to excuse the parties from Rule 26(f) initial disclosures; except as to the ParaGard New Drug Application (NDA) that was transferred on or about November 10, 2005, to Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and produced by TWH, Inc., to plaintiff in the Estrada case. 8. Case management and initial orders: The parties are ORDERED to confer as to proposed orders for the list found herein. See order for further specifics and instructions. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 2/10/2021. (kxm) |
|
| 1 | 1
7
pgs
cmp
Complaint
Thu 06/30 12:28 PM
SHORT FORM COMPLAINT with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-11899120) filed by Andee Korth.(kxm) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
|
|
Att: 1
Civil Cover Sheet
|
||
|
utility
Terminate Civil Case
Thu 06/30 12:31 PM
Civil Case Terminated. (kxm) |
||