Zarlenga et al v. United States Of America et al
| Rhode Island District Court | |
| Judge: | Mary S Mcelroy |
| Referred: | Lincoln D Almond |
| Case #: | 1:22-cv-00372 |
| Nature of Suit | 470 Other Statutes - Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| Cause | 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Case Filed: | Oct 12, 2022 |
| Re-opened: | Jan 19, 2024 |
| Terminated: | May 14, 2024 |
| Last checked: Monday Apr 10, 2023 5:33 AM EDT |
|
Defendant
Rhode Island State Police
|
|
|
Defendant
Thrive Behavioral Health Center, Inc
|
|
|
Defendant
The Providence Center
|
|
|
Defendant
TGI Fridays Restaurant Corporation
|
|
|
Defendant
Holly Jean Steeves
|
|
|
Defendant
State of Rhode Island Office of the Attorney General
|
|
|
Defendant
State of Rhode Island Dept. of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities, and Hospitals
|
|
|
Defendant
State of Rhode Island Department of Mental Health Advocate
|
|
|
Defendant
State of Rhode Island
|
|
|
Defendant
Judge Stephen I. Sherwood
|
|
|
Defendant
Kenneth Schreiber
|
|
|
Defendant
Rhode Island Supreme Court
|
|
|
Defendant
Town of West Warwick
|
|
|
Defendant
Rhode Island Hospital
|
|
|
Defendant
Jack F. Reed
|
|
|
Defendant
Gina M. Raimondo
|
|
|
Defendant
RI District Court
|
|
|
Defendant
Judge Madeline Quirk
|
|
|
Defendant
Providence Rescue Mission
|
|
|
Defendant
Providence Police Department
|
|
|
Defendant
Barack Hussein Obama, II
|
|
|
Defendant
North Kingstown Police Department
|
|
|
Defendant
Robert S. Mueller
|
|
|
Defendant
Christopher A. Wray
|
|
|
Defendant
United States of America
|
|
|
Defendant
MD James K. Sullivan, MD
|
|
|
Defendant
MD Richard D. Scott, MD
|
|
|
Defendant
MD Patrick Schule, MD
|
|
|
Defendant
Emily Rowlands, MD
|
|
|
Defendant
MD David Mysels, MD
|
|
|
Defendant
MD Daniel J. Levine, MD
|
|
|
Defendant
MD Dragon J. Golijanin, MD
|
|
|
Defendant
MD Arnaldo A. Berges, MD
|
|
|
Defendant
Mark Zuckerberg
|
|
|
Defendant
Eric Yankee
|
|
|
Defendant
Nicholas Murphy
|
|
|
Defendant
Judge Pamela A. Woodcock-Pfeiffer
|
|
|
Defendant
Sheldon Whitehouse
|
|
|
Defendant
West Warwick Police Department
|
|
|
Defendant
Warwick Police Department
|
|
|
Defendant
Scott Warmington
|
|
|
Defendant
Stephen Vannini
|
|
|
Defendant
Alan J. Valliere
|
|
|
Defendant
United States Supreme Court
|
|
|
Defendant
United States Attorneys Office, District of Rhode Island
|
|
|
Defendant
U.S. Department of Justice
|
|
|
Defendant
James Caruolo
|
|
|
Defendant
Gregg Etter, MD
|
|
|
Defendant
Nicholas J. Dinardo
|
|
|
Defendant
Robert D. Desjarlais
|
|
|
Defendant
Timothy J. Curtin
|
|
|
Defendant
Cranston Police Department
|
|
|
Defendant
Coventry Police Department
|
|
|
Defendant
Connecticut State Police
|
|
|
Defendant
James B. Comey
|
|
|
Defendant
City of Providence, Rhode Island
|
|
|
Defendant
Edward A. Charbonea
|
|
|
Defendant
Lincoln D. Chafee
|
|
|
Defendant
Facebook, Inc.
|
|
|
Defendant
Anthony Capraro
|
|
|
Defendant
Donald Archibald
|
|
|
Defendant
James A. Bazzinotti
|
|
|
Defendant
Butler Hospital
|
|
|
Defendant
George W. Bush
|
|
|
Defendant
Judge Elaine T. Bucci
|
|
|
Defendant
Brian Brothers
|
|
|
Defendant
Tomas Bogusz
|
|
|
Defendant
Joseph Biden
|
|
|
Defendant
Jack Belkin, MD
|
|
|
Defendant
Mark Knott
|
|
|
Defendant
Mohegan Sun Casino
|
|
|
Defendant
Joseph E. Mee
|
|
|
Defendant
Daniel J. McKee
Individually and in his capacity as current Governor for the State of Rhode Island 82 Smith St. ( State House)
Providence, RI 02903 |
|
|
Defendant
Andrew G. McCabe
|
|
|
Defendant
Massachusetts State Police
58 Tufts Street
east longmeadow, MA 01028 |
|
|
Defendant
Christopher S. Mason
|
|
|
Defendant
James M. Manni
Individually and in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Rhode Island State Police 311 Danielson Pike
North Scituate, RI 02857 |
|
|
Defendant
Ernest Lavigne
|
|
|
Defendant
Justin Lake
|
|
|
Defendant
Chief Judge Jeanne LaFazia
|
|
|
Defendant
Kent County Hospital
|
|
|
Defendant
Patrick Kelly
|
|
|
Defendant
John and Jane Does 1 through 100
|
|
|
Defendant
John Doe Entities 1 through 50
|
|
|
Defendant
John Doe Corporations 1 through 50 and other
|
|
|
Defendant
Judge Colleen Hastings
|
|
|
Defendant
Johnson Gregory
|
|
|
Defendant
Foxwoods Resort Casino
|
|
|
Defendant
Foxboro Massachusetts Police Department
|
|
|
Defendant
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
|
|
Plaintiff
Victoria A. Zarlenga
|
|
|
Plaintiff
Lori A. Zarlenga
150 Nashua Street Apartment 5A
Providence, RI 02904 |
| Docket last updated: 02/04/2025 11:59 PM EST |
| Wednesday, January 29, 2025 | ||
| 56 | 56
appeal
USCA Judgment
Wed 01/29 10:12 AM
JUDGMENT of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit entered as to47 Notice of Appeal, filed by Lori A. Zarlenga,53 Notice of Appeal, filed by Lori A. Zarlenga. JUDGMENT entered by Lara E. Montecalvo, Appellate Judge; Julie Rikelman, Appellate Judge and Seth Robert Aframe, Appellate Judge. 24-1672 Affirmed 25-1062 Affirmed 24-1672 25-1062 (Gonzalez Gomez, Viviana) |
|
| Thursday, January 23, 2025 | ||
|
order
Order on Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis
Thu 01/23 8:13 AM
TEXT ORDER. This case has a long history of Complaints, Amended Complaints and appeals, that, despite their length (up to 151 pages) fail to state a claim for relief that the Court can discern. Indeed, it is precisely because of the rambling length of Ms. Zarlengas filings that the Court has been unable to find a plausible claim for relief that would justify federal question jurisdiction. Most recently, the Court denied Ms. Zarlenga In Forma Pauperis (IFP) status in pursuing an appeal of the denial of a motion for reconsideration that appeared to be an attempt to reopen an appeal on which the plaintiff had previously defaulted. See Text Order of 12/11/24. Ms. Zarlenga filed a Notice of Appeal from that determination and, in the instant Motion (ECF No. 54) requests In Forma Pauperis (IFP) while pursuing that appeal in the Circuit Court. First, the appropriate procedural step seems to be the filing of a new Motion for IFP status in the Circuit Court, not an appeal from this Courts denial. Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). (challenge to a trial courts certification of frivolousness under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) should be by a new Motion to Proceed IFP on Appeal in the Circuit Court and not by an appeal of the district courts denial). Accord, Camp v. Putnam, 807 Fed. Appx. 303, 304-05 (5th Cir. 2020); Lay v. Oklahoma Dept. of Corrections, 746 Fed. Appx. 777, (10th Cir. 2018). Even if Ms. Zarlengas procedural move to appeal this Courts denial of IFP status is proper, on December 11, 2024, the Court denied IFP status because it determined that the current appeal was frivolous and not taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3). That conclusion of frivolousness has not changed and bars this Court from granting the instant Motion (ECF No.54 ), which is DENIED. Ms. Zarlenga is reminded of the earlier directive that she is not permitted to make any further filings in this case other than a notice of appeal. See text Order of June 20, 2024. Any filings in violation of that Order will be returned by the Clerk.. So Ordered by District Judge Mary S. McElroy on 1/23/2025. (Potter, Carrie) |
||