Kansas District Court
Judge:Daniel D Crabtree
Referred: Teresa J James
Case #: 5:24-cv-04055
Nature of Suit440 Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights
Cause42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Case Filed:Jun 24, 2024
Terminated:Jan 03, 2025
Last checked: Sunday Dec 22, 2024 5:16 AM CST
Defendant
Chris Burger
Represented By
Garrett Robert Roe
Hinkle Law Firm Llc - Lenexa
contact info
Bradley Joseph Schlozman
Hinkle Law Firm LLC
contact info
James Rodriguez
Kansas Attorney General - Topeka
contact info
Defendant
Earl Glynn
Represented By
Garrett Robert Roe
Hinkle Law Firm Llc - Lenexa
contact info
Bradley Joseph Schlozman
Hinkle Law Firm LLC
contact info
James Rodriguez
Kansas Attorney General - Topeka
contact info
Defendant
Nicholas Hale
Represented By
Garrett Robert Roe
Hinkle Law Firm Llc - Lenexa
contact info
Bradley Joseph Schlozman
Hinkle Law Firm LLC
contact info
James Rodriguez
Kansas Attorney General - Topeka
contact info
Defendant
Andrew Harrison
Represented By
Garrett Robert Roe
Hinkle Law Firm Llc - Lenexa
contact info
Bradley Joseph Schlozman
Hinkle Law Firm LLC
contact info
James Rodriguez
Kansas Attorney General - Topeka
contact info
Defendant
Jerome Hellmer
Represented By
Garrett Robert Roe
Hinkle Law Firm Llc - Lenexa
contact info
Bradley Joseph Schlozman
Hinkle Law Firm LLC
contact info
James Rodriguez
Kansas Attorney General - Topeka
contact info
Defendant
Beau Jackson
Represented By
Garrett Robert Roe
Hinkle Law Firm Llc - Lenexa
contact info
Bradley Joseph Schlozman
Hinkle Law Firm LLC
contact info
James Rodriguez
Kansas Attorney General - Topeka
contact info
Defendant
Samuel Klaassen
Represented By
Garrett Robert Roe
Hinkle Law Firm Llc - Lenexa
contact info
Bradley Joseph Schlozman
Hinkle Law Firm LLC
contact info
James Rodriguez
Kansas Attorney General - Topeka
contact info
Defendant
Tess Ramirez
Represented By
Garrett Robert Roe
Hinkle Law Firm Llc - Lenexa
contact info
Bradley Joseph Schlozman
Hinkle Law Firm LLC
contact info
James Rodriguez
Kansas Attorney General - Topeka
contact info
Defendant
Mark Skoglund
Represented By
Garrett Robert Roe
Hinkle Law Firm Llc - Lenexa
contact info
Bradley Joseph Schlozman
Hinkle Law Firm LLC
contact info
James Rodriguez
Kansas Attorney General - Topeka
contact info
Defendant
John Solbach
Represented By
Garrett Robert Roe
Hinkle Law Firm Llc - Lenexa
contact info
Bradley Joseph Schlozman
Hinkle Law Firm LLC
contact info
James Rodriguez
Kansas Attorney General - Topeka
contact info
Plaintiff
Fresh Vision OP, Inc.
4091 W 136th Street
Leawood, KS 66224
Represented By
Ryan A. Morrison
Institute For Free Speech
contact info
Courtney Corbello
Institute For Free Speech
contact info
Joshua A. Ney
contact info
Charles Michael Miller
Institute For Free Speech
contact info
Ryan A. Kriegshauser
Kriegshauser Ney Law Group
contact info
Plaintiff
Chengny Thao
Secretary and Treasurer, Fresh Vision OP, Inc. 4901 W. 136th Street
Leawood, KS 66224
Represented By
Ryan A. Morrison
Institute For Free Speech
contact info
Courtney Corbello
Institute For Free Speech
contact info
Joshua A. Ney
contact info
Charles Michael Miller
Institute For Free Speech
contact info
Ryan A. Kriegshauser
Kriegshauser Ney Law Group
contact info
Plaintiff
James G. Muir
President, Fresh Vision OP, Inc. 4901 W. 136th Street
Leawood, KS 66224
Represented By
Ryan A. Morrison
Institute For Free Speech
contact info
Courtney Corbello
Institute For Free Speech
contact info
Joshua A. Ney
contact info
Charles Michael Miller
Institute For Free Speech
contact info
Ryan A. Kriegshauser
Kriegshauser Ney Law Group
contact info

GPO Jul 24 2024
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AND SCHEDULING ORDER granting in part 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Order for details. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 07/24/2024. (kmc)
GPO Jan 03 2025
ion of this court as necessary to enforce the Permanent Injunction. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 1/3/2025. (mam)MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Plaintiffs Fresh Vision OP, Inc., James Muir, and Chengny Thao's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 2) is granted in part and denied in part. Those same plaintiffs also prevail, in part, at trial on the merits of their claim in Count I. The court thus issues a permanent injunction, as set forth below. The court finds for defendants on plaintiffs' facial challenge in Count I. So it denies the other forms of requested relief sought by Count I. On Count II's as applied and facial challenges to the independent expenditure threshold, the court concludes itlacks subject matter jurisdiction over these challenges. Plaintiffs lack standing to assert either claim, so the court dismisses Count II. The court issues the following Permanent Injunction: Defendants and their officers, agents, servants, employees, and other persons acting in concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Injunction by personal service or otherwise are permanently enjoined from designating plaintiffs as a "political committee" under Kan. Stat. Ann § 25-4143(l)(1) based on a determination that express advocacy is a major purpose of Fresh Vision. Instead, defendants may designate plaintiffs as a "political committee" under Kan. Stat. Ann § 25-4143(l)(1) based only on a determination that express advocacy is the major purpose of Fresh Vision. All parties shall be subject to the jurisdict

Docket last updated: 03/12/2025 11:59 PM CDT
Wednesday, February 19, 2025
53 53 appeal Transcript Wed 02/19 12:07 PM
TRANSCRIPT of Bench Trial Closing Arguments held December 20, 2024 before Judge Daniel D. Crabtree, Court Reporter Kim Greiner, 913-735-2314, kim_greiner@ksd.uscourts.gov. Transcript purchased by: Ryan Kriegshauser. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: Within 7 calendar days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the party's intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy is located on our website at www.ksd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 5/20/2025. (kg)
Related: [-]
52 52 appeal Transcript Order Form (by Court Reporter) Wed 02/19 8:58 AM
TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM by Court Reporter Kim Greiner ordering transcript of Bench Trial Closing Arguments December 20, 2024 re46 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment filed by Chengny Thao, James G. Muir, Fresh Vision OP, Inc. () Transcript due by 3/14/2025. (kg)
Related: [-]
Friday, February 14, 2025
51 51 appeal Transcript Order Form Fri 02/14 1:42 PM
TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM: Transcript Requested Cont. Preliminary Injunction and Bench Trial 12/20/24 filed by Fresh Vision OP, Inc., James G. Muir, Chengny Thao re46 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment (Kriegshauser, Ryan)
Related: [-]