Rosado v. Martinez et al
New York Eastern District Court | |
Judge: | Hector Gonzalez |
Case #: | 2:25-cv-01568 |
Nature of Suit | 350 Torts - Personal Injury - Motor Vehicle |
Cause | 28:1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
Case Filed: | Mar 21, 2025 |
Case in other court: | Supreme Court State of New York, Suffolk County, 624256/2024 |
Last checked: Friday Mar 21, 2025 12:10 PM EDT |
Defendant
A. Duie Pyle, Inc.
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Klever Martinez
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Wilson Rosado
|
Docket last updated: 04/02/2025 11:59 PM EDT |
Thursday, March 27, 2025 | ||
9 | 9
![]() SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to file on the docket a joint letter describing the case and a completed civil case management plan by May 1, 2025, as further described in the attached mandatory requirements. The parties' joint letter shall include a description of any discovery that has already been conducted in state court prior to Defendants' removal of this case. Requests for adjournment of the deadline for these submissions will be considered only if made in writing and otherwise in accordance with Section I.D of the Court's Individual Practices. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 3/27/2025. (RCM) |
|
misc
Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge - Declined
Thu 03/27 8:30 AM
NOTICE to Assign District Judge: The Clerk of Court is directed to reassign this case to a district judge. (LV) |
||
utility
Case Assigned/Reassigned
Thu 03/27 9:08 AM
Case Reassigned to Judge Hector Gonzalez. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our[LINK:website] . Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ) |
||
order
Status Report Order
Thu 03/27 4:27 PM
ORDER: Plaintiff shall file a letter no longer than three pages on or before April 3, 2025, explaining Plaintiff's position regarding whether this case was properly removed from state court. Plaintiff's letter must address not only whether the Court has diversity or federal question jurisdiction over the claims at issue in this case, but also whether removing Defendants complied with the procedural requirements for removal, including the requirements in 28 U.S.C. § 1446. Each Defendant may file a responsive letter no longer than three pages on or before April 10, 2025. If Plaintiff's letter indicates that removal was improper, the Court will likely take under consideration whether to remand this case based solely on the parties' letters, without affording Defendants the opportunity further to brief the issue, regardless of whether each Defendant files a responsive letter. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 3/27/2025. (RCM) |
||
Tuesday, March 25, 2025 | ||
8 | 8
![]() Letter Requesting Assignment of District Judge by Wilson Rosado (Gechlik, Stuart) |
|
Friday, March 21, 2025 | ||
7 | 7
![]() NOTICE of Appearance by Stuart K. Gechlik on behalf of Wilson Rosado (aty to be noticed) (Gechlik, Stuart) |
|
6 | 6
![]() CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by A. Duie Pyle, Inc., Klever Martinez re1 Notice of Removal,,2 Corporate Disclosure Statement Notice Filed In Supreme Court Suffolk County (Finkelstein, Matthew) |
|
5 | 5
![]() Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here:[LINK:https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program.] Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website:[LINK:https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program.] (LJ) |
|
4 | 4
![]() This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (LJ) |
|
3 | 3
![]() Civil Cover Sheet.. Re1 Notice of Removal,, Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet, by A. Duie Pyle, Inc., Klever Martinez (Finkelstein, Matthew) |
|
2 | 2
![]() Corporate Disclosure Statement by A. Duie Pyle, Inc. (Finkelstein, Matthew) (Main Document 2 replaced on 3/21/2025) (LJ) |
|
1 | 1
![]() NOTICE OF REMOVAL by A. Duie Pyle, Inc., Klever Martinez from Supreme Court, Suffolk County, case number 62456/2024. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANYEDC-18876572) Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes (Finkelstein, Matthew) (Main Document 1 replaced on 3/21/2025) (LJ). Modified on 3/21/2025 (LJ) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
Att: 3
![]() |
||
Att: 4
![]() |
||
Att: 5
![]() |
||
Att: 6
![]() |
||
Att: 7
![]() |
||
notice
Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet
Fri 03/21 11:38 AM
Notice: Re: Requires Newly Updated Civil Cover Sheet. The Civil cover sheet has been updated and The Clerk's Office requires the updated version of the civil cover sheet to continue to process this case. The form is available at: https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/forms/js-44-civil-cover-sheet. Please resubmit using new JS44. This event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (LJ) |
||
utility
Case Assigned/Reassigned
Fri 03/21 1:32 PM
Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our[LINK:website] . Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ) |