Ashford et al v. Google, Inc. et al
Nebraska District Court | |
Judge: | Ryan C Carson |
Case #: | 8:25-cv-00284 |
Nature of Suit | 320 Torts - Personal Injury - Assault, Libel, & Slander |
Cause | 28:1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander |
Case Filed: | Apr 16, 2025 |
Case in other court: | USDC-NE, 8:25-CV-95 District Court of Douglas County, Nebraska, CI25-1226 |
Last checked: Wednesday Apr 16, 2025 5:07 PM CDT |
Defendant
Alphabet, Inc.
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
Jane Does 1-1000
|
|
Defendant
Go Gamers
|
|
Defendant
Google, Inc.
|
Represented By
|
Defendant
John Does, 1-1000
|
|
Defendant
Roses Roses
|
|
Plaintiff
Timothy L. Ashford
4014 Redick Avenue
Omaha, NE 68110 |
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Timothy L. Ashford, P.C.L.L.O.
|
Represented By
|
Docket last updated: 04/23/2025 11:59 PM CDT |
Tuesday, April 22, 2025 | ||
9 | 9
order
Order on Objection
Tue 04/22 3:56 PM
TEXT ORDER overruling8 Plaintiff's objection as moot. The undersigned extended Defendant's answer deadline as the extension was requested prior to the expiration of the original deadline and good cause was shown. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A) (permitting extensions for good cause with or without motion or notice if the court acts, or if the request is made, before the original time or its extension expires.) Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ryan C. Carson. (CEW) |
|
Monday, April 21, 2025 | ||
8 | 8
![]() OBJECTION to Order on Motion to Extend,, Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading, 7 by Attorney Timothy L. Ashford on behalf of Plaintiff Timothy L. Ashford, P.C.L.L.O..(Ashford, Timothy) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Friday, April 18, 2025 | ||
7 | 7
order
Order on Motion to Extend Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading
Fri 04/18 12:00 PM
TEXT ORDER granting6 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading. Defendants Alphabet, Inc. and Google, Inc. shall have until May 14, 2025 to file an answer or other responsive pleading as to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ryan C. Carson. (KNH) |
|
Thursday, April 17, 2025 | ||
6 | 6
![]() MOTION to Extend , MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading by Attorney Patrick M. Flood on behalf of Defendants Alphabet, Inc., Google, Inc..(Flood, Patrick) |
|
Wednesday, April 16, 2025 | ||
5 | 5
![]() DISCLOSURE Statement Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 by Attorney Patrick M. Flood on behalf of Defendants Alphabet, Inc., Google, Inc..(Flood, Patrick) |
|
4 | 4
![]() NOTICE of Related Case by Attorney Patrick M. Flood on behalf of Defendants Alphabet, Inc., Google, Inc. (Flood, Patrick) |
|
3 | 3
![]() Certificate of Service (Amended) by Attorney Patrick M. Flood on behalf of Defendants Alphabet, Inc., Google, Inc..(Flood, Patrick) |
|
2 | 2
oth_evt
Assignment of Judges
Wed 04/16 3:58 PM
TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNED: Magistrate Judge Ryan C. Carson assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (RMR) |
|
1 | 1
![]() NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand against All Plaintiffs from District Court of Douglas County, NE, Case number CI 25-1226 ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANEDC-5302040) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Patrick M. Flood on behalf of Alphabet, Inc., Google, Inc.(Flood, Patrick) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
Att: 3
![]() |
||
Att: 4
![]() |
||
Att: 5
![]() |
||
Att: 6
![]() |
||
Att: 7
![]() |
||
Att: 8
![]() |
||
utility
Remark - Public (Related Case)
Wed 04/16 4:00 PM
Remark - Public : This notice serves to advise the parties that a plaintiff noted this case as related to another pending or closed case in this court. If a case is noted as related on the cover sheet or case opening screen when filed, the clerk assigns it to the district judge who handled the earlier pending or closed case. See NEGenR 1.4(a)(4)(B). Any challenge to operation of this rule must be made pursuant to NEGenR 1.4(a)(7). (RMR) |