Galvan v. Federal Express Corporation
| Nebraska District Court | |
| Judge: | Susan M Bazis |
| Referred: | Jacqueline M Deluca |
| Case #: | 4:26-cv-03296 |
| Nature of Suit | 710 Labor - Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Cause | 15:2(a) Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Case Filed: | Sep 18, 2026 |
| Case in other court: | USDC-NE, 4:26cv03289 |
| Last checked: Friday Sep 18, 2026 9:01 AM CDT |
|
Defendant
Federal Express Corporation
|
|
|
Plaintiff
Deanna Galvan
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 09/23/2026 11:59 PM CDT |
| Friday, September 18, 2026 | ||
| 3 | 3
oth_evt
Attorney Letter
Fri 09/18 9:10 AM
ATTORNEY LETTER by Clerk that Attorney Shannon Liss-Riordan has not registered for admittance to practice or registered for the system. If the requested action is not taken within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter, this matter will be referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the entry of a show cause order. (GR) |
|
| 2 | 2
oth_evt
Assignment of Judges
Fri 09/18 9:08 AM
TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Susan M. Bazis and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. DeLuca assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (GR) |
|
| 1 | 1
cmp
Complaint
Fri 09/18 8:14 AM
COMPLAINT with jury demand against Federal Express Corporation ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANEDC-5649004), by Attorney Olena Savytska on behalf of Deanna Galvan(Savytska, Olena) |
|
|
Att: 1
Civil Cover Sheet,
|
||
|
Att: 2
Exhibit A - Abner Order
|
||
|
utility
Remark - Public (Related Case)
Fri 09/18 9:08 AM
Remark - Public : This notice serves to advise the parties that a plaintiff noted this case as related to another pending or closed case in this court. If a case is noted as related on the cover sheet or case opening screen when filed, the clerk assigns it to the district judge who handled the earlier pending or closed case. See NEGenR 1.4(a)(4)(B). Any challenge to operation of this rule must be made pursuant to NEGenR 1.4(a)(7). (GR) |
||