Justine Briggs, et al v. Merck Sharp & Dohme
Original Case: 3:14-cv-01677
| Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals | |
| Case #: | 0:15-cv-55873 |
| Type | civil / private |
| Nature of Suit | 365 Torts - Personal Injury - Product Liability |
| Case Filed: | Jun 08, 2015 |
| Terminated: | Aug 06, 2015 |
| Last checked: Friday Feb 19, 2016 3:55 AM PST |
|
Defendant - Appellee
MERCK SHARP & DOHME
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
JENNIFER HANNAN
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
JOHN CONSENTINO
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
JAMES HOLZBAUR
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
RALPH WILOUGHBY
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
WILSON THOMAS
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
RUTH STUDER
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
SHAMBRE SKIDMORE
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
SILVANA ROSSI
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
CAROL GOODWIN
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
DORIS PARSHALL
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
JUSTINE BRIGGS
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
ROBERT RUBUS
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
BRUCE RININGER
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
CHARLOTTE PEAK
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
JOE LADNER
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
DELORES HEDRICK
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
EDWIN PRETTER
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
JAMES OWENS
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
SELESTINO LOVATO
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
JOHN BUCKLEY
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
CATHERINE CITRANO
|
Represented By
|
GPO
Aug 06 2015
FILED OPINION (WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, RICHARD A. PAEZ and MARSHA S. BERZON) REVERSED AND REMANDED. Judge: WAF Authoring. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [9636719] [15-55873, 15-55874, 15-55875, 15-55876, 15-55877] |
| 1. | Ninth Circuit Returns Diabetes Drug Litigation to State Court (metnews.com) |
| Submitted Wed 08/12/2015 | |
| Docket last updated: 08/12/2015 9:00 AM PDT |
| Monday, June 08, 2015 | ||
| 1 | 1 Filed order (WILLIAM C. CANBY and JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN) in case no. 15-80011 on 6 8-2015 Jonathan L. Williams, Esq.’s motion for withdrawal as counsel for respondent Merck Sharp & Dohme is denied as moot. Jonathan L. Williams, Esq., is no longer listed as counsel of record on the court’s docket. The petition for permission to appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1453(c) is granted. See Coleman v. Estes Express Lines, Inc., 627 F.3d 1096, 1100 (9th Cir. 2010) (per curiam). Within 7 days after the filing date of this order, petitioners shall perfect the appeal pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 5(d). The appeal will be consolidated for all purposes with the appeals filed pursuant to the orders granting permission to appeal in docket nos. 15-80012 15-80014 15-80015 and 15-80016 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1453(c)(2), the court shall complete all action on this appeal, including rendering judgment, not later than 60 days after the date on which the appeal was filed. See also Bush v. Cheaptickets, Inc., 425 F.3d 683, 685 (9th Cir. 2005) (stating that 60-day time period begins to run when the court accepts the appeal). The parties shall submit, via electronic filing, simultaneous briefs and excerpts of record within 10 days after the filing date of this order. No reply briefs will be accepted. The parties are encouraged to join in a single brief on each side for the consolidated appeals. In addition to all issues the parties wish to brief, the parties shall address whether petitioners’ petition for permission to appeal was timely filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1453(c)(1). Also, within 10 days after the filing date of this order, by 5:00 p.m. (Pacific time), the parties shall submit to the Clerk’s Office in San Francisco 10 copies of the briefs and 4 copies of the excerpts of record in paper format, accompanied by certification that the briefs are identical to the versions submitted electronically. Any motion to extend time to file the briefs shall strictly comply with the requirements set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1453(c)(3). The Clerk shall calendar this case during the week of July 6, 2015 in Pasadena, California. [9564920] (RT) [Entered: 06/08/2015 11:48 AM] | |
| 2 | 2
DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Fee due from Appellants Justine Briggs, John Buckley, Catherine Citrano, John Consentino, Carol Goodwin, Jennifer Hannan, Delores Hedrick, James Holzbaur, Joe Ladner, Selestino Lovato, James Owens, Doris Parshall, Charlotte Peak, Edwin Pretter, Bruce Rininger, Silvana RossI, Robert Rubus, Shambre Skidmore, Ruth Studer, Wilson Thomas and Ralph Wiloughby on 06/08/2015. Appellants Justine Briggs, John Buckley, Catherine Citrano, John Consentino, Carol Goodwin, Jennifer Hannan, Delores Hedrick, James Holzbaur, Joe Ladner, Selestino Lovato, James Owens, Doris Parshall, Charlotte Peak, Edwin Pretter, Bruce Rininger, Silvana RossI, Robert Rubus, Shambre Skidmore, Ruth Studer, Wilson Thomas and Ralph Wiloughby opening brief due 06/18/2015. Appellee Merck Sharp & Dohme answering brief due 06/18/2015. [9564931] (RT) [Entered: 06/08/2015 11:50 AM]
|
|
| 3 | 3 Notice of Oral Argument on Friday, July 10, 2015 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 3 - Pasadena CA. View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case here. When you have reviewed the calendar, download the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE form, complete the form, and file it via Appellate ECF or return the completed form to: PASADENA Office. [9566018] 15-55873 15-55874 15-55875 15-55876 15-55877 (KS) [Entered: 06/08/2015 04:24 PM] | |
| 4 | 4 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. (for case no. 15-55873 Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 06/08/2015. [9566389] (RT) [Entered: 06/09/2015 09:06 AM] | |